Humboldt on Kosmos: Ornament and Order

Autori

  • Stefanie Buchenau Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18443/401

Parole chiave:

Cosmos, connections between natural phenomena and their interactions with one another, awe of cosmos, architectual beauty of Humboldt's language, aesthetics

Abstract

Humboldt’s Kosmos asserts the intelligibility of a single, unified world against chaos and multiple disconnected worlds. By invoking the Pythagorean notion of kosmos as order and ornament, Humboldt maintains this unity under modern conditions of openness and partial accessibility. Crucially, this entails a reconfiguration of the faculties: sensibility assumes functions once entrusted to reason, apprehending the infinite and giving it form as a representation of the world, while reason ceases to be primarily contemplative and instead operates on this basis to discern laws, to order and systematize observations. Beauty no longer expresses a preexisting order but makes its rational apprehension possible, allowing diversity to be grasped as unity. Kosmos thus presents a modern one-world epistemology where aesthetic perception and scientific explanation are inseparable.

Biografia autore

  • Stefanie Buchenau, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris

    Professor of German History of Ideas at Sorbonne Nouvelle. She studied Comparative Literature, German Studies, and Philosophy in Munich, Paris, and Yale, completing a joint PhD at Yale and ENS Lyon in 2004 and a habilitation at Panthéon-Sorbonne in 2017. Her research focuses on German Enlightenment philosophy, aesthetics, philosophical anthropology, and early German ecology. Selected publications include The Founding of Aesthetics in the German Enlightenment (Cambridge UP, 2013/2015) and Menschenwürde. Kant und die Aufklärung (Meiner, 2023).

Pubblicato

2026-06-19

Fascicolo

Sezione

Articolo

Come citare

Buchenau, S. (2026). Humboldt on Kosmos: Ornament and Order. HiN - Alexander Von Humboldt Im Netz. Internationale Zeitschrift für Humboldt-Studien, 27(51), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.18443/401